Who decides the parameters of whether hearings are open or closed to the public?

The committee collectively decides whether hearings are open or closed to the public because it ensures that the decision reflects a consensus within the governing body responsible for managing the disciplinary process. This approach allows for a fair evaluation of the relevant factors, such as the nature of the case, transparency, and public interest, ensuring that all committee members contribute their perspectives.

In contrast, having only the Discipline Committee Chairman make that decision could lead to inconsistency and a lack of broader input. Individual members of the public do not possess the authority to influence the decision on access to the hearings, as such matters are typically reserved for the committee's deliberation. Local government regulations may provide general guidelines, but the final determination typically rests with the committee's collective judgment, ensuring that the decision aligns with the principles governing their proceedings.